About LS.n


 
 

Review: Star Trek: Insurrection
by Mark Leigh

published 12/14/98

REVIEWS HOME



Mark Leigh is a freelance writer based in New York.



MOST RECENT YAK ABOUT THIS ARTICLE:

Subj: right
trekkies are a bunch of retarded nerds who have no knowledge of scientific facts.

-- Ditell
Apr 16, 2007 at 5:55AM

Read more or post your own





Be cool like us!
Are you getting our weekly update?





It's GOOD to share!
E-mail this article to a buddy

Star Trek: Insurrection
Odd-numbered Trek movies suck. Compare the Trek 2, 4 and 6 (Ricardo Montalban and earwigs, chasing whales, trapped in prison with Iman) to 1, 3, and 5 (bald chick, walking around in the wind with a boy Spock and Doc from Back To The Future, looking for God in all the wrong places). Same goes for the two Picard films. Generations showed the Captain swooning over "A Child's Christmas in Wales", First Contact was a robot zombie movie with Alfre Woodard and the farmer from Babe.

Insurrection does little to change the pattern. The plot centers on the Enterprise's discovery of a high-ranking Federation Admiral getting into bed with a leathery faced alien (F. Murray Abraham) to mine a peaceful planet's "fountain of youth." In doing this, though, they will displace the planet's population, thus violating the Prime Directive. So our boys have to help the peaceful, nubile, toga-wearing, aqueduct-using, technology-shunning, hyper-intelligent folk called the Ba'ku to resist.

I'd love to see Insurrection with Al Sharpton. The Ba'ku (a race so intelligent it chooses to live without Sony Playstations, despite having advanced scientific knowledge), is maybe one or two shades darker than Eddie and Johnny Winter. There's also the highly Clintonian way the evil Admiral parses his words, describing how displacing the Ba'ku does not technically violate the Prime Directive (it all depends on your definition of the words 'photon torpedo').

This is all academic. I go to Star Trek movies for two reasons: to see nerdish pseudo-science and to watch shit blow up. There are some good examples of the former, like when Picard rhapsodizes about his days as an Ensign, when he could tell just by listening how many microns a ship function was displaced. Sadly, there was not much of the latter.

Most of the special effects looked cheap and quick. The bulk of the action involved the Enterprise team holding doofy-looking plastic rifles and picking off giant, buzzing darts in a park. I'm serious. The darts would, like, beam them.

In lieu of fight scenes, there's enough new-agey faux philosophy to make Yanni cringe. Picard learns to live within the moment with his 319 year old girlfriend, so much so that hummingbirds fly at half speed. Slow-moving birds . . . just what this franchise needed.

F. Murray Abraham overacts so miserably I half expected him to shout "Curses!" once his plan was foiled. I saw the guy play Lear . . . he must've needed to make a payment on a house.

Will I go see the next Trek flick? Probably. It being an even-numbered film, the odds are on my side.


Your name:

Subject:


Comments:

Forward a copy of this yak to the LS.n Editors

Forward a copy of this yak to this article's author

If you want to get an e-mail if someone responds to your yak, give us your address below. It won't be made public.

THE YAK SHACK


Name: Ditell
Subject: right
-- Apr 16, 2007 at 5:55AM
trekkies are a bunch of retarded nerds who have no knowledge of scientific facts.


This page is best viewed with the latest version of the Netscape or Microsoft Internet Explorer browser.

© Copyright 1998-2001 LeisureSuit Media, LLC, All Rights Reserved.
Some content is copyrighted by the author and is used with permission. No portion of this page or its content may be reproduced, in part or in whole, electronically, in print, or in any other form or by any other means, without the written consent of the LeisureSuit.net editors. Contact us at webmaster@leisuresuit.net.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]