About LS.n


 
 

Review: Radiohead's Kid A
by Jordan Hoffman

published 10/23/00

REVIEWS HOME




Jordan Hoffman is LeisureSuit.net's Queens-based Senior Editor.



MOST RECENT YAK ABOUT THIS ARTICLE:

Subj: Idiot Fans
"I think they are just corporate sluts spreading their legs open waiting for die-hard fan to screw them."

....The problem with making a radio friendly album is that idiots want you to continue to make rubbish three minute pop songs. To that moron 'Godspeed' who made the above comment, Kid A was made for the exact opposite reason. But you look like an idiot now.

Face facts. The bends was a decent album with a few stand out songs. Radiohead's first two albums were overall sh*te. And Pablo Honey is a disgrace

-- Tomas
Mar 2, 2008 at 2:12PM

Read more or post your own





Be cool like us!
Are you getting our weekly update?





It's GOOD to share!
E-mail this article to a buddy

I'll say one thing for Radiohead's "Kid A": It's a hell of a lot better than anything Moby will ever put out.

I suppose I should be grateful for "Kid A"--finally a rock album has knocked horrible rap acts like Eminem and Nelly, or dreadful, lifeless compilations like "Now That's What I Call Music Vol. 4," off the top of Billboard's charts. The only problem is that "Kid A" isn't a rock album.

Some call it IDM for "intelligent dance music," some call it illbient, and the great Deb Sroge calls in "bleepity-bloop." Whatever term you have for electronica, there's no denying that it is an artform, and one that enterprising rock bands should be encouraged to dabble with in creating new work. Radiohead did a bang-up job with their last album, "OK Computer," but with "Kid A" they've made a fatal flaw. They forgot the rock.

In preparing this review, I've gone back and listened to all of Radiohead's previous work. And I realize that I've been foolishly letting their second album, "The Bends," sit in the back library for too long. "The Bends" is a brilliant rock record filled with power and emotion. This is coming from a man who does not hide that the radio hit "Creep" knocked his socks off, and he still considers that Radiohead's best individual song. "The Bends" contains guitar as heavy as anything you'll find from Rage Against The Machine, but also finds room for melody and harmony. The follow-up, "OK Computer," did away with some of the straight-ahead rawk for some unique bleepity-bloop, but did not forget that people sometimes like to sing along. Like Bono and Morissey before him, vocalist Thom Yorke has an inviting weeping-wail. If you know for sure you're the only one in the house, you can really belt along in harmony to tunes like "High and Dry," "Nice Dream," "No Surprises, " and "Subterranean Homesick Alien."

Critics and fans went apeshit for "OK Computer"'s innovative use of swirly dreamscape technology. A new "Pet Sounds," they said, and I won't be the one to disagree. If I prefer "The Bends," then it won't surprise you that I prefer "All Summer Long" in the Beach Boys' repertoire. My main point is this: when it came time to make a follow-up to "OK Computer," Radiohead put the cart before the horse. "Kid A" is all style, no substance.

Which is not to say that I dislike it. I think it's interesting. I even shelled out my own dough, as the label did not see fit to send me a promo (which, I can assure you, will not effect the editorial integrity of this review.) Some people who were a little baffled by "Kid A" have said that you need to listen to it a few times before it "sinks in." I think the exact opposite. When listened to the first time, freshly, and additional times as, say, background music, it works fine. It is when it is scrutinized again and again that one recognizes that there is no there there.

There are only a handful of songs meaty enough to analyze. The second track, "Kid A," is so drowning in toy piano and computer effects that it took me a few listens to notice there were actual vocals in the mix (though not speaking English, I'm sure.)

The third cut, "The National Anthem," is good fun. It opens with a driving bass, lots of swirly effects, and some actual verses (the first on the album.) While it may be the high point on the album, it still feels a little like an anti-climax. Just as the groove is getting ready to kick into high-gear rawk—right when the guitars come in—the track just ends. The decision was made to rely solely on the "block rockin'" break-beats. I mean, yeah, maybe at a club that's all that the DJ can give you, but if you are a band that's recorded cuts like "Bones" in your past history, why not use all the arrows in your quiver?

There are some spooky ballads like "In Limbo" and "How to Disappear Completely" that are successful because they keep their sites low. To those that point to cuts like these and say Radiohead are the heir apparent to Pink Floyd and the chalice of 70s prog, I'd like to remind them all of bands like Dream Theater that are very much alive and well, though not nearly as trendy or worthy of ink. I will agree that the album cover of "Kid A" is much more retro.

My favorite cut is "Optimistic." It is the most traditional, the only one with up-front guitar and fully belted-out vocals. My least favorite is "Treefingers," an instrumental swamp of forgettable tones. Perhaps "Treefingers" represents the greatest cultural shift for popular music, but "Optimistic" is the one I'd like to blast on my headphones while caught in Times Square foot-traffic. And that, we all know, is the only way to measure a song's virtue.


Your name:

Subject:


Comments:

Forward a copy of this yak to the LS.n Editors

Forward a copy of this yak to this article's author

If you want to get an e-mail if someone responds to your yak, give us your address below. It won't be made public.

THE YAK SHACK


Name: Tomas
Subject: Idiot Fans
-- Mar 2, 2008 at 2:12PM
"I think they are just corporate sluts spreading their legs open waiting for die-hard fan to screw them."

....The problem with making a radio friendly album is that idiots want you to continue to make rubbish three minute pop songs. To that moron 'Godspeed' who made the above comment, Kid A was made for the exact opposite reason. But you look like an idiot now.

Face facts. The bends was a decent album with a few stand out songs. Radiohead's first two albums were overall sh*te. And Pablo Honey is a disgrace

Name: paul
Subject: Kid a
-- Oct 20, 2007 at 8:08AM
i totally agree with your review, radiohead have lost the rock.. pablo honey was pretty good mainly focusing on guitar i think- creep obviously being the best on that album.

the bends is my favorite one of all, it also uses alot of guitar but puts a bit of creep in all of its songs.

Ok computer focused mainly on creep style i think but still an excelent album with 'karma police', 'paranoid android' masterpeices..

but then... kid a..
i totally agree with you, no rock its completely changed genres and their songs are so.. empty..
i have kind of given up on radioheads later albums, and am just replaying the earlier ones over and over.

Name: alan
Subject: Radiohead in general
-- Sep 30, 2005 at 10:48PM
THEY SUCK!

Name: Drumkid
Subject: Kid A radio head in general
-- May 8, 2005 at 8:59PM
i find it interesting that the popular phrase " one could slit their wrists to this music" is taken in such a negative way.i've always found that their music is a release. it touches on subjects which are depressing and complements the act of blood letting, which i find is a positive experience. i don't want to confuse. depression is to me a positive experience.

Name: Joel
Subject: Kid A
-- May 8, 2005 at 3:24PM
Radiohead don't have to make albums with guitar riffs similar to their other albums. Kid A was the first Radiohead album i heard, and, it amazes me.
bottom line is, you can't call yourself a lover of music, or even just a radiohead fan if you can't accept change. or respect the effect different instruments have on the listener.
anyway, i love Kid A

Name: Dave
Subject: Kid A
-- Apr 12, 2005 at 5:32PM
Does anyone here actually get radiohead? all your comments are fucking stupid and even the good ones are just reviews of an interpretation of kid A

Name: Gordon
Subject: Kid A: A Color Incredible.
-- Jan 31, 2005 at 3:39PM
Kid A was bound to be placed in the bin of mixed reviews; it's a shocker. Just remember, everything goes somewhere, and everything is born from something else. This is what Kid A is about, and this is how it grows, and this is how electricity expands in its world, and this is how their world is created. Their world is vast, with that one key of derivity in mind, and it creates a world deeper than anything imaginable, one that lasts forever (or until the end of track 10). The tracks are varient but ebb and flow as one. They each make their mark and give way to the next piece of glowing conciousness. Conciousness is a journey, part is beat heavy with groove and rhythm, while part is floating and ambiguous. This album is a journey, don't mistake it for a flop.


PS: this album sucks.

Name: Brett
Subject: Kid a is a-ok
-- Dec 6, 2004 at 3:06PM
In my opinion this is radiohead's best album. Kid a is not experimental is progressive and highly intelligent as reflected in the excellent manner it is arranged. ingenious. The cd has never failed to bore me. Try listening to it on headphones and playing it 1/4 of a second slower in a car with subwoofers and a nice echo effect. Oh yes, ingesting psilocybin enhances the effect wonderfully. Radiohead proves that insturments no longer need be played traditionally and that traditional insturments need not be played to produce historic music.

Name: Conventions of the Fourth Dimension AKA Czech Bear
Subject: Alright.
-- Mar 21, 2004 at 9:33PM
All respect due, this review was neither well thought through or well prosed. Much extraneous belligerencedru. That said, The Conventions of the Fourth Dimension says this: If you like consistent tempos and feel-good rhythms, listen to reggae music; gain some of the intelligence found therewithin; then, when a time has passed an inch, and maybe theres a beard crawling on your chin, and your hair has grown, or fallen out perhaps, sit down, and listen to Kid A, and feel silly for expecting more "creep" (radioheads single greatest song??? (answer: wrong) Much Beautiful music pores from the crown of radiohead, creep (aka I want to hold your hand, she loves you, yesterday) is a simpleton's staring point for one of the most radical groups in the history of popular music. And if you enjoy comparison, call Kid A Sargent Pepper, with ringo on the fill-less drum machine. Also, Believe in yourself.

Name: Mark
Subject: Review: Radiohead's Kid A
-- Jan 31, 2004 at 9:13PM
A silly review. No substance? Listen further. Immerse yourself in this. This is the most perfectly realised album ever; a concept brought to life combined with a completely different avenue for what was essentially a guitars and bass rock band.
A change that made me a fan.

Name: julien
Subject: Kid A
-- Oct 14, 2003 at 6:11PM
has it ever occured to anyone that Radiohead isn't a rock band? Radiohead is an amazing, talented group of artists who have decided to evolve music as a whole, not just the rock genre. Pure rock fans that are looking for Rage Against the Machine-esque tracks and hard guitars won't be satisfied with Kid A, true, but Radiohead tries to reach out to different crowds, not just one. They play the music for the sake of music, not to please core-hungry rock fans. I'm all for hard rock, but as a musician, this album has really opened my mind into trying new kinds of music with MY band.

Name: sarah
Subject: Review: Radiohead's Kid A
-- Oct 10, 2003 at 10:33AM
why do the people who have such a strong dislike for a band waste their time sending negative emails? must not have too much of a life. you guys should concentrate on bands you do like, this way you dont look so f*n pathetic using all their lonely time to try and bring ugliness to a very beautiful expirience, music that one person could slit their wrists too( and by the way that is getting so old,at least be original)is music another person could be totally charged by. i saw them last night 10/9 at msg.one of the best shows i've seen.

Name: James Nethercote
Subject: KID A
-- Sep 23, 2003 at 4:06PM
KID A is a album that some people will love and others will hate.

Name: Godspeed
Subject: mmm... kid me not
-- Sep 7, 2003 at 11:46AM
I hated radiohead after this album. Hated them even more when I watched their video. I think they are just corporate sluts spreading their legs open waiting for die-hard fan to screw them.

Name: John
Subject: lyrics to "Kid A" They are in English
-- Jun 11, 2003 at 4:51PM
I slip away.
I slipped on a little white light.
We've got heads on sticks.
You've got ventriloquists.
We've got heads on sticks.
You've got ventriloquists.
Standing in the shadows at the end of my bed.
Standing in the shadows at the end of my bed.
Standing in the shadows at the end of my bed.
The rats and children follow me out of town.
The rats and children follow me out of town.

Name: penis
Subject: all
-- Apr 30, 2003 at 4:08PM
this sight is extreamly sexy!

Name: Nemesis
Subject: Kid A
-- Mar 25, 2003 at 4:47AM
Radiohead knew they'd lose fans by bringing out this album.
That's also a reason why I have so much respect for this phenomenal band. This music doesn't let itself being put into categories.
Welcome to the musical, mindblowing world called Radiohead

Name: pete(scotland)
Subject: kid A
-- Feb 9, 2003 at 4:17PM
at long last.the world can now all suck on the teat that is radiohead

Name: Elvis Monroe
Subject: Kid A
-- Jan 30, 2003 at 12:15PM
This is an amazing album. It is one of the most comunicative pieces of arework i have ever witnessed in any instance.
Any critic that thinks this is not at least good is deranged.

Name: xrcd
Subject: radiohead overated
-- Jan 2, 2003 at 3:40AM
radiohead is so overated, only made famous by one song on one album. to me they are just another one hit wonder. kid-a is just newage elevator music!

Name: ben death
Subject: radiohead kik ass
-- Jun 15, 2002 at 3:58PM
KID A IS A MILE STONE IN ROCK HISTORY!! IT'S THAT GOOD.

Name: LA
Subject: Wonderful
-- May 27, 2002 at 10:40PM
Lateralus and Kid A: Two champions of art in our time. Fuck the critics; these bands make music that for its own sake.

Name: BRIANNA
Subject: uneducated ramblings...
-- Mar 15, 2002 at 7:18AM
MY EARS LIKE THE MUSIC.
im not being political.
i dont care.
i wasnt gonna write nethang here.
but then i did.
KID A...
is FUCKING AWESOME.

Name: Krovax
Subject: Magic: the Faltering
-- Feb 21, 2002 at 4:23AM
What the hell is with all this anti-US... B.S.
Peace-out mah brothas?

Oh yeah: I think you're crazy, Hoffmee.

Name: catz
Subject: Review: Radiohead's Kid A
-- Nov 14, 2001 at 2:53PM
i'm not too sure who exactly you're addressing there "damien", people who like or dislike kid a or what?!!! anyway, I would just like you to know that I'm IRISH!(oh and it's spelt "matthews"

Name: damien
Subject: kid A
-- Nov 8, 2001 at 7:47AM
Fucking americans don't have a clue. Go back to your dave mattews bands and phish and shit like that. Stick it up your arse.

Name: Catz
Subject: kid A
-- Oct 13, 2001 at 11:43AM
ok, so Kid A is different, so what!, did any of us really want another album exactly like Ok Computer?? There are huge differences between Pablo Honey and The Bends, and again between The Bends and Ok Computer, but no one then went on about Radiohead being crap and pretentious. This is just yet another completely different album from a genuinely artistic band,(and there are very few of these now, as i'm sure we are painfully aware of)that continues to evolve. good thing. If Radiohead were not the kind of band that experimented, than we could very well now be stuck with a hundred other songs by them that sound the same as creep and anyone can play guitar, etc... And it is also possible that Radiohead got sick of other bands attempting to copy their style, so they decided to go and change it completely.
Anyway, lets stop expecting consistency and deal with the fact that experimentation is a good thing (just listen to the first few chords of optimistic....)

Name: Catz
Subject: kid A
-- Oct 13, 2001 at 11:43AM
ok, so Kid A is different, so what!, did any of us really want another album exactly like Ok Computer?? There are huge differences between Pablo Honey and The Bends, and again between The Bends and Ok Computer, but no one then went on about Radiohead being crap and pretentious. This is just yet another completely different album from a genuinely artistic band,(and there are very few of these now, as i'm sure we are painfully aware of)that continues to evolve. good thing. If Radiohead were not the kind of band that experimented, than we could very well now be stuck with a hundred other songs by them that sound the same as creep and anyone can play guitar, etc... And it is also possible that Radiohead got sick of other bands attempting to copy their style, so they decided to go and change it completely.
Anyway, lets stop expecting consistency and deal with the fact that experimentation is a good thing (just listen to the first few chords of optimistic....)

Name: Mike *B*
Subject: OK Computer
-- Sep 17, 2001 at 9:52AM
This album has touched me. i have not purchased the album KidA yet but if it is anything like OK Computer it will Fucking Kick Ass!!

Name: John !
Subject: Kid A
-- Sep 5, 2001 at 8:26AM
Got the album, listened to it once and knew the whole thing is crap. Give me my money back.

Name: Arwyn
Subject: Is Kid A any good
-- Aug 12, 2001 at 8:09PM
This is how my mate put it. It's quite a read.

So the reviews are mixed. Q magazines prints strange pictures, with the caption ‘You won’t believe what they’ve done!’. Overall the feeling is that the album is too different, the songs are experiments, not anthems. They’ve gone all experimental. Once again, it seems that, rather than stay on the motorway, there has been a change in plan, the route planner has failed, the GPS is whirring, and the road map is on fire! Radiohead have left at junction 12, and are bombing along at breakneck speed down a twisting country lane.

October. To say your expectation was high would be quite an understatement. Of course, Radio 1 plays the songs in advance, and the band are interviewed. The hairs rise on the back of your neck as you hear for the first time, the latest offering from this groundbreaking group. Motion Picture Soundtrack is beautiful, and so different to the demo that you’ve heard on a bootleg. The Saturday before release date, you cry as the beauty of the breathtaking ‘How To Disappear’ takes you far away from the cold, noisy record shop that you are stuck in.

And when you finally buy it, in all it’s glory, the first flick through is promising. Something’s not right though. It doesn’t seem to be as you expected. It’s difficult to put your finger on the problem. The ‘dance beats’ could have been an issue, but that’s not it. The strange sounds, and distorted voices are different, but not unacceptable. What is it??

You see them play that night. The National Anthem could be one of the strongest opening songs by any band at any time, it’s phenomenal. Only problem is, the album version seems weak by comparison. You could grow to love these songs, you think.

Trouble is, it’s 6 months later, you still don’t love the songs, and it’s driving you mad, because you still don’t know what it is that’s the problem. What is it?? The album has been played too much by the group of friends, all desperately trying to love the album, but failing. Everyone is left empty, distracted, and frustrated. You’re trying so hard not to admit defeat, but you are beginning to think the critics are right. In late June you confide in others that you are not happy with the album. You’ve given up. Of course, you now have ‘Amnesiac’. Now that’s got a few songs that are incredible, different, and you think probably better than ‘Kid A’. Now we’re getting somewhere, aren’t we?

July, South Park, incredible show. A week later the fog is lifting. Those strange songs that once made no sense, the crazy lyrics, they begin to make sense.

Wednesday 18th July. 10.30pm. No lights in your room. Now this is it. ‘Kid A’ is incredible. It might, might be better than anything they’ve done before. What are you saying, what about a certain masterpiece which goes under the name of ‘OK Computer’? No, surely not, but no, it is. In one crazy listen this is it. What can I say? You’ve taken your time, but it was well worth the wait.

It starts gently, the first song has a hint of restlessness and frustration. Then the title track is melodic, echoing and stunning, stunningly beautiful. It has a strange haunting beauty that you thought they might have lost, obviously not. ‘National Anthem’ is wild and outrageous as it settles into the incredible, incredible, incredible ‘How To Disappear’. Then lie back and chill out, relax, as the sounds wash over you like a warm tide at sunset. Out of the blue, its ‘Optimistic’, and it’s a damn fine song as well. You knew it was quite good when you first heard it, but never this good. ‘In Limbo’ is definitely how you think it would feel to be lost at sea. ‘Idioteque’ scares, haunts, and excites. Morning Bell is now emerging as an anthem that you longed to hear after ‘OK Computer’. And then it’s all rounded off with Motion Picture Soundtrack (and the bonus track as well). This used to sound incomplete, and empty, now it might be even better than the beautiful demo that you heard so long ago.

Yeah, OK now you admit, it may well be the best thing that they have done. An outrageous statement and one that you don’t believe you’re making, but you are.

Faith restored, music back on track, everything in its right place……………..

Name: scotty
Subject: Creative?
-- Jul 31, 2001 at 10:52PM
You'd "rather listen to tortoise or Portishead"if you wanted to listen to "music that is creative"? Why are you listening to Radiohead then? Certainly, it can't be for guitar heavy Cock-Rock. Kid A is one of the most creative albums ever, created by one of the most creative bands ever.

Name: maike
Subject: in the end, no good
-- Mar 21, 2001 at 9:23PM
i wouldnt call it a "piece of shit," but it certainly disappoints. i think many of the people praising the album are diehard fans such as myself, but refuse to come to grips with the fact that radiohead has put out a bad album. theres no deepness that is not apparent in the second listing, if you believe so, you are just fooling yourself. or is it radiohead that is fooling all of us with this album?

Name: slur
Subject: Kid A..piece of shit
-- Nov 15, 2000 at 6:23PM
A good wide taste of music. I guess that means you have to enjoy stuff that's too boring to sleep to. They tried to hard to be artistic. I'd rather listen to tortoise or Portishead if I wanted to listen to music that is creative. At least they aren't so fucking boring. BLAHHHH

Name: mizz lizzy
Subject: kid a
-- Oct 29, 2000 at 1:12PM
If you have a good, "wide" taste,
you´ll get it...

Name: dr no
Subject: Kid A
-- Oct 23, 2000 at 12:10AM
This albums sounds a lot like the soundtrack to "Real Genius."


This page is best viewed with the latest version of the Netscape or Microsoft Internet Explorer browser.

© Copyright 1998-2001 LeisureSuit Media, LLC, All Rights Reserved.
Some content is copyrighted by the author and is used with permission. No portion of this page or its content may be reproduced, in part or in whole, electronically, in print, or in any other form or by any other means, without the written consent of the LeisureSuit.net editors. Contact us at webmaster@leisuresuit.net.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]